<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Yet Another Audio-Technica VM95 Cartridge Review	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.audioresurgence.com/2022/06/yet-another-audio-technica-vm95-cartridge-review.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.audioresurgence.com/2022/06/yet-another-audio-technica-vm95-cartridge-review.html</link>
	<description>~Audiophile Reviews &#124; Gossip &#124; Gear~</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 26 Jan 2024 00:51:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Thomas		</title>
		<link>https://www.audioresurgence.com/2022/06/yet-another-audio-technica-vm95-cartridge-review.html#comment-29541</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Thomas]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Jan 2024 00:51:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.audioresurgence.com/?p=17214#comment-29541</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[The fact that the AT VM95 carts and the ART9 were run on different tables/arms renders this entire comparison irrelevant.  Other reviews I have seen of the AT VM95 carts have stated that they sound superb on expensive turntables, even down to the AT VM95c.  Theses carts gave what the Technics SL-1500 was capable of retrieving, not what they were capable of retrieving as shown in the cartridge review posted by Stereophile (where they used $6995 two-motor, belt-drive Dr. Feickert Blackbird turntable equipped with a 10.5&quot;, $1995 Schick tonearm.)]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The fact that the AT VM95 carts and the ART9 were run on different tables/arms renders this entire comparison irrelevant.  Other reviews I have seen of the AT VM95 carts have stated that they sound superb on expensive turntables, even down to the AT VM95c.  Theses carts gave what the Technics SL-1500 was capable of retrieving, not what they were capable of retrieving as shown in the cartridge review posted by Stereophile (where they used $6995 two-motor, belt-drive Dr. Feickert Blackbird turntable equipped with a 10.5&#8243;, $1995 Schick tonearm.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
