<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Ultrasonic Record Cleaning	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.audioresurgence.com/2022/06/ultrasonic-record-cleaning.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.audioresurgence.com/2022/06/ultrasonic-record-cleaning.html</link>
	<description>~Audiophile Reviews &#124; Gossip &#124; Gear~</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 19 Dec 2022 03:47:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Jim Tutsock		</title>
		<link>https://www.audioresurgence.com/2022/06/ultrasonic-record-cleaning.html#comment-29406</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim Tutsock]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Dec 2022 03:47:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.audioresurgence.com/?p=17221#comment-29406</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I&#039;m with you on the time element. I bought a VPI HW-17F 20 years ago in immaculate condition and have cleaned a few hundred records with it. I would preclean if any were really dirty, but that was rare. Recently added a Groovinator pre cleaning treatment/process before the VPI. That was nice, I could hear a difference.. But just too much time, and I have been wanting to switch to ultrasonic and start over, and the Audio Desk Systeme Glass finally reached an iteration with the Pro X that does everything reliably. Like the old infomercial with the rotisserie cooker it&#039;s &quot;set it and forget it&quot;. Except that the rollers don&#039;t always engage (apparently the individual record&#039;s fault so no predicting...) and I need to wait 5 seconds and then nudge the record on occasion. Yes it is now $4600 which I would never pay, but found a 3 year old one used only to clean hundred records from a reputable source for $1835 delivered. Very happy, but I still like what the Groovinator does. So that would slow down the process but I have some time now. Fremer bought the review sample on a earlier model so that&#039;s good enough for me. I plan to get a good chunk of the $ back selling the VPI.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m with you on the time element. I bought a VPI HW-17F 20 years ago in immaculate condition and have cleaned a few hundred records with it. I would preclean if any were really dirty, but that was rare. Recently added a Groovinator pre cleaning treatment/process before the VPI. That was nice, I could hear a difference.. But just too much time, and I have been wanting to switch to ultrasonic and start over, and the Audio Desk Systeme Glass finally reached an iteration with the Pro X that does everything reliably. Like the old infomercial with the rotisserie cooker it&#8217;s &#8220;set it and forget it&#8221;. Except that the rollers don&#8217;t always engage (apparently the individual record&#8217;s fault so no predicting&#8230;) and I need to wait 5 seconds and then nudge the record on occasion. Yes it is now $4600 which I would never pay, but found a 3 year old one used only to clean hundred records from a reputable source for $1835 delivered. Very happy, but I still like what the Groovinator does. So that would slow down the process but I have some time now. Fremer bought the review sample on a earlier model so that&#8217;s good enough for me. I plan to get a good chunk of the $ back selling the VPI.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
